Comments on: Carrie Prejean – XXX Fraud

By: RHsimard

RHsimard — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:24:09 +0000

By the numbers:
@laurieD : She was TOLD, initially, the answer had cost her the crown. Later that changed. I am not saying there was any deception involved; in the absence of evidence to the contrary, I’ll assume both statements to her were correct as understood at the time.

It’s hardly surprising she’d be less than pleased at that, even if it took a day or two after learning of the updated information for it to wear off. That’s been a non-issue for a very long time.

Nude pictures? A few very mild topless and mostly not-quite topless. Maybe a lot of Christians don’t like that. Lots of others (including me) consider such very minimal exposure to be no big deal (Christian or non-Christian alike; this is not a position I’ve chosen only because of the Prejean debacle). In any case, raising bloody hell about it for just her is hypocritical.

I have yet to see any video, audio, online text or other quote of her pronouncing herself morally superior to anyone.

A wife making a video like that (or a thousand, for that matter) for a husband isn’t troubling Christian belief at all. She wasn’t married; that makes the tape just like any case of unmarried Christians having some kind of sexual involvement. See the stats on that? I’ll refrain from any moral opinion on it; suffice it to say that even among staunch evangelical Christian young adults, premarital chastity is in the minority, and the world seems to take that in stride–unless your name is Carrie Prejean. How God takes it is none of your business–or mine.

@Frances: The only reason to bring up Obama’s statement is to demonstrate the radical difference between the REACTION to his versus Carrie’s. If she is a “gay-hater” for her words, it follows that anyone else saying the same words must be the same thing, and you’d expect to see the same rancor about it. It’s not there.

And among you who are bashing her (I make no apologies for that choice of terminology), how many of you can honestly say that your dislike or disapproval of her began with the discovery of those photos or the tape? That you were fine with her, personally, before then?

By: Tennessean

Tennessean — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:11:28 +0000

Anomaly/Chester – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov-1S8Xxd94

Silly girl. I quoted your words exactly.

Btw….where did you come up with the “opposite marriage” quote? I’m not saying she didn’t say it. I just haven’t been able to find it as yet.

By: Anomaly100

Anomaly100 — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:38:44 +0000

@Tennessean: Don’t take what I’ve said out of context. It went like this:

“Anyone ever figure out what “opposite sex” is? That has got to be the funniest thing I’ve ever heard. I guess it’s whatever she was doing in the the video.”

You have NO sense of humor. Apparenly, you’ve forgotten that copying & pasting “clogs the blog.”

Slap yourself in the face & wake up. ;-)

By: Tennessean

Tennessean — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:10:28 +0000

Jesus Friggin’ Christ Anomaly!

ALERT FROM INSIDE TENNESSEAN’S BUBBLE!!!!

12 and 20 messages above respectively: (direct quotes from “Anomaly100″)

“No, I do NOT know what “Opposite sex” is.”

“Anyone ever figure out what “opposite sex” is?”

By: Anomaly100

Anomaly100 — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:34:26 +0000

@Tennessean: If you ventured outside of that narcissistic bubble you live in you might be able to follow a conversation. The dimwit, Ms Prejean said ” “We live in a land that you can choose same-sex marriage or OPPOSITE marriage.” I know what the “opposite sex” is. I’ve just never heard of, “opposite sex.”

According to Prejean & both of her brain cells, your definitions are in fact, “OPPOSITE”, therefore one of you is very wrong in your definition. So, Prejean, who is one of you new female Conservative leaders, is wrong, or you are. Scroll up & you’ll see that this is the 2nd copy & paste I’ve done on this enlightening subject. Try to keep up Larry…er..Tennessean.

In fact, oh wise one, copy & paste Dahl’s comment because it should be a dictionary. Look up Anita Bryant & you’ll see Prejean’s face next to it. However, Prejean apparently has not evolved. I can’t believe this idiot is trying to sell a book about her short 22 year life, in which she claims to be victimized. All she’s done that is noteworthy is the pageant, which is no biggie, relatively speaking. Even Elizabeth from the View, seemed to be having a difficult time defending Prejean’s Sainthood. ;-)

By: Mario Piperni dot Com » Blog Archive » Carrie Prejean - Misunderstood but Still Standing

Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:40:11 +0000

[...] a followup to the Carrie Prejean story. . . Does Hannity get royalties for having written the forward to her [...]

By: Dahl

Dahl — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:39:19 +0000

Carrie Prejean has just become the new face of Anita Bryant in a little more evolved society.

What we think of homosexuality is not just a moral opinion – This is someone’s Life we are messing with – Where did we get the power to decide what rights we will grant or deny to another American? Why would their pursuit of happiness be SECONDARY to our pursuit of happiness?

I’m just trying to make sense or grasp the logic of the arguments.

If the lifestyle is harming another person – criminalize it. If the lifestyle is offensive remove yourself from the area or don’t stare. BTW, how would you even KNOW if they were married or not? Do you know if the heterosexuals next door are married or gasp, living in sin?

By: janine

janine — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:06:10 +0000

@Tennessean

Well, traditional marriage doesn’t work out for over 50% of the population, hence the high divorce rate. why not give same-sex couples a crack at it?

By: Frances

Frances — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:55:27 +0000

@Tennessean, you left off the “whack job” part. Like calling someone a “morally deprived whack job” isn’t wishing them ill will. Maybe a sociopath wouldn’t think so. But it is something adversarial that someone would say about a group of people he didn’t like.

By: Tennessean

Tennessean — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:42:56 +0000

Anomaly, the opposite sex (noun): (n [S + singular or plural verb])
Someone who is male if you are female, and female if you are male

(From the Cambridge Online Dictionary. I can’t get the link to copy and paste.)