.
Former Miss California, Carrie Prejean, gets her just reward.
Carrie Prejean demanded more than a million dollars during her settlement negotiations with Miss California USA Pageant officials — that is, until the lawyer for the Pageant showed Carrie an XXX home video of her handiwork.
The video the lawyer showed Carrie is extremely graphic and has never been released publicly. We know that, because TMZ obtained the video months ago but decided not to post it because it was so racy. Let’s just say, Carrie has a promising solo career.
We’re told it took about 15 seconds for Carrie to jettison her demand and essentially walk away with nothing.
I’d let this story go as just another dim-witted bimbo doing her thing except that it feels a little satisfying watching Prejean get her words and actions thrown back into her face. It’s her anti-gay remarks AFTER the pageant (I had no problem with her pageant comments…she’s entitled to her opinion) that was bothersome. She set herself up as a poor little victim who got ostracized for speaking out against gay marriage all the while portraying herself as a Bible-loving do-gooder.
Another classic example of a conservative hypocrite making judgments on others based on beliefs which they themselves privately trample.
Fox News reported back in September…
Carrie Prejean isn’t going away anytime soon. In fact, the controversially dethroned Miss California can be yours for an entire month of October in 2010. The Clare Both Luce Policy Institute, a conservative women’s group based outside of Washington, DC has just released its fifth annual Great American Conservative Women Calendar which features top women leaders in the Conservative Movement, and this time around Prejean’s face will be in the top spot.
“I was so honored to be in the calendar as one of the great American conservative women. As a former beauty queen, it’s refreshing to be taken seriously,” she said in a statement.
A Penthouse spread is no doubt in Prejean’s future…or a Fox News gig. No dignity required for either job.
___
To receive email notifications of new posts from MarioPiperniDotCom, click on Subscribe.
.
so…..when is the tape being released?
The biggest moral ralliers tend to be the worst offenders.
Who does that? I mean 90% do and the rest are liars, but who films it? Rotten little brothers with hidden cameras? What?
It takes a special brand of stupid to find yourself in a situation like this after a segment of the country has basically canonized you. It would be hard to make up something more ironic than this.
She tried to appear so morally righteous that, I can’t feel to sorry for her. This is what you call bad karma kicking her silly ass.
Ha!
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by buzztok: Conservative darling Carrie Prejean’s XXX Fraud. http://bit.ly/1ZvA4j...
If sex is sex with two people, is sex by yourself “opposite sex?”
Another hypocritical Bible loving doer of good……. There really are a lot of those….perhaps it’s the water
Is it hypocritical to be an ardent practitioner and supporter of sex, yet not support same sex marriage? Or speak out against it?
Is so, there sure are a whole lot of hypocrites in the States.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/04/maine-gay-marriage-vote-e_n_344688.html
“Gay marriage has now lost in every single state — 31 in all — in which it has been put to a popular vote.”
Tell the former Miss California that Vivid Video is always hiring new talent!
Tennessean, yes. It is and yes there are. It is hypocritical to maintain that you hold the only valid definition of what unions are moral and acceptable. It is hypocritical to say that gay marriage will ruin marriage for straight people when they are doing a fine job of it already. It is hypocritical to lie to the public with anti-gay propaganda that persuades people that gay sex will be taught to 3rd graders if gay marriage is allowed. For a liar to say that a gay person is immoral is the height of hypocracy.
So, according to my list these things are okay by you:
1) Lying – because that’s what anti-gay activists and insurance lobbies are doing.
2) Torture – because that’s what Dick Cheney instigated and authorized.
3) Massive weaponry for mentally unstable people – because I’m against it.
And these things are not okay by you:
1) Marriage between two people who love each other who happen to be the same sex – because the Bible and some lobby group told you so.
2) Quality, affordable health care for everyone – because people who don’t have it are lazy and don’t deserve it.
Frances says, “It is hypocritical to maintain that you hold the only valid definition of what unions are moral and acceptable.” Isn’t that exactly what you are doing? Aren’t you saying those whose definition does not match up with yours are “hypocritical”? Aside from that, the majorities in those 31 states will be happy to hear they are hypocrites I’m sure.
Let me ask you this, if the majority is for a Public Option and that is good enough for you guys, then why wouldn’t a majority being against Same Sex Marriage carry the same weight with you? Aside from that, I did not state my opinion. I simply asked a question and you jumped to a conclusion.
Your numbered points are at best a display of ignorance. I know you can do better. Please spend more time addressing the subject and less time in a failed attempt to speak for me.
It just seems to me that for whatever reason, you are suggesting that since this young lady had sex at some point in her life, it diminishes her legitimate personal opposition to same sex marriage.
I can’t agree with that regardless my opinion for or against same sex marriage.
And for what it’s worth Frances, I do not favor same sex marriage. And it has absolutely nothing to do with either the Bible or any Lobby Group.
I am however strongly in favor of a form of Legally Recognized Civil Union with all rights to the parties that marriage would entail.
I just believe in preserving the concept of the “Traditional” Marriage with no malice or ill will for anyone.
“I just believe in preserving the concept of the “Traditional” Marriage with no malice or ill will for anyone.” is code for “I am homophobic.”
And for the record, Prejean did not just “have sex”. She had someone film her while masturbating which is fine. She just shouldn’t go around using the bible to defend her intolerant views.
[...] Mario Piperni dot Com » Blog Archive » Carrie Prejean – Fraud By admin | category: mario | tags: california, carrie-prejean, column-on-spoiled, [...]
TN, Gay Rights is a … let me put it this way: human civil rights issue. There was a time when the majority of the voting public was for slavery and Jim Crow after that. Guess what? We didn’t vote for whether or not African Americans could have their freedom or their civil rights. That shouldn’t be a ballot issue and neither should Gay civil rights. It’s unseemly. It’s wrong.
States are famous for using their sovereign rights to slip in things like segregation and anti-miscegenation laws. It took Federal law to override the racially prejudiced mindset of the populace so that America could begin to be a truly just nation. If the Supreme Court has to make the decisions that give gay people their basic human rights and protection from persecution, then so be it. The states have had their chance and failed miserably. The ignorant, hateful public deserves to be overruled.
TN said “Your numbered points are at best a display of ignorance. I know you can do better. Please spend more time addressing the subject and less time in a failed attempt to speak for me.”
No. I am not ignorant and have not displayed ignorance, so quit acting like the dissappointed father figure. I don’t need it and you don’t measure up to the task. I have merely mirrored back to you a synopsis of your own comments here. Your words speak for themselves.
Your many posts are at best a display of arrogance and errors of logic. A stupendous display, in fact.
[...] here to wager the original: Mario Piperni extend Com » Blog Archive » Carrie Prejean – Fraud Posted in Uncategorized | Tags: bib-and, California, carrie, carrie-prejean, demanded-more, [...]
zenith, MASTURBATING!!!!!! OH MY FREAKIN’ GOD!!!! HOW TWISTED!!!!!
You say, “I just believe in preserving the concept of the “Traditional” Marriage with no malice or ill will for anyone.” is code for “I am homophobic.” which is the same as saying “Anyone against Obama is Racist”
Neither statement is valid and both are mindless cop outs.
Frances says, “The ignorant, hateful public deserves to be overruled.”
And therein is why a reasonable, freedom loving public will always eschew radical liberalism.
Let me ask you Frances, what will be your recourse when YOU are deemed to be a part of that “ignorant, hateful public”?
And I was prepared to respond to your other comment, but with the mindset you articulate with your “ignorant, hateful public” statement, I choose not to waste the time or effort.
People that think the way you do deserve whatever ill comes their way.
Good luck.
If you’re against gay marriage, that’s fine. Then don’t do it. No one is forcing you to marry a gay person or someone of the same sex as you. It’s none of anyone’s business what two consenting adults want to do with their sex lives. Gay people shouldn’t be prohibited from marrying the person they love just because they love people of the same sex. It used to be that women were traded from their fathers to their future husbands, or the marriages were arranged for the sake of money and higher status. That didn’t work for straight people, so they quit the practice and began marrying for love (although people still get married for other reasons). Gay people should be afforded the same privilege to marry the person they love.
There’s nothing inherently wrong with erotic film or masturbation. There’s nothing inherently wrong with people of the same sex having sex with each other either. Carrie Prejean has made herself out to be the arbiter of moral and correct sex, and she has defined that as between members of the opposite sex. She basically had sex with herself in this film, which according to her twisted views on sexuality, goes against what she has told the world is righteous and correct sex. That makes her a hypocrite. She wants to tell other people what to do with their sex lives, that is, she wants everyone to have sex with the opposite sex, but she doesn’t practice what she preaches. That makes her a hypocrite. We wouldn’t be discussing this if she minded her own business.
Emily, here is where you guys go off on some radical tangent.
To the best of my knowledge, Carrie Prejean simply said she did not support same sex marriage. I’m not aware of any statement she made disparaging Gays. (I haven’t researched it.) You guys want to extrapolate all kinds of malice and ill intent from that. Not only for her but for ANYONE who simply voices the view they do not favor same sex marriages.
Whether right or wrong, the majority of Americans do not support same sex marriage. I can provide you with links to numerous polls but you can easily enough google it for yourself. The majority of Americans DO support Civil Unions. The majority of Americans ARE against discrimination based on sexual orientation. The majority of Americans ARE beginning to swing toward openly homosexuals serving in the military.
I don’t think Ms. Prejean said at any point how she wished anyone to conduct their sexual lives. I don’t think she ever made the statement she only wants everyone to have sex with someone of the opposite sex. She simply said she does not approve of Same Sex Marriage. And the majority of Americans agree with her.
So I find the argument from the radical left that simply opposing same sex marriage automatically renders you “homophobic” disingenuous.
Since you’re part of the radical right, I got this from a source you trust.
Carrie tells Fox News: “This happened for a reason. By having to answer that question in front of a national audience, God was testing my character and faith. I’m glad I stayed true to myself.”
She is the hypocrite, not us. She wanted the world to think she’s a good Christian girl & I find that pertinent because she lied. No one is allowed to compete if they are a centerfold, and they are REALLY not allowed if they’re a porn star wannabe. You already know this. You argue any point. Do you feel you are making us see the light? Perhaps you’ll get to us & we’ll say, “Her dictionary is really good, so I should listen,” I know this much about Prejean: She’s a liar, a hypocrite & she’s phony. But, she is another one of your leaders as Mario showed us:
“Conservative Women Calendar which features top women leaders in the Conservative Movement, and this time around Prejean’s face will be in the top spot.”
Anyone ever figure out what “opposite sex” is? That has got to be the funniest thing I’ve ever heard. I guess it’s whatever she was doing in the the video.
TN, I stand by what I have said about the ignorant, hateful public. Anyone who perpetrates the lie that 3rd graders are going to be forced to learn about gay sex is a hateful liar and the people who believe them are ignorant. If you are in either of those categories, then wear the shoe because it fits. Quit talking out of both sides of your mouth. You know, when you post stuff here, people remember it and can go back and look at what you’ve written in other threads.
Does this sound familiar to you?
“You guys pee all over yourselves every time some group of morally deprived whack jobs force same sex marriage through the courts or through the legislative bodies.”
Even you would have to recognize the disparity:
“I just believe in preserving the concept of the “Traditional” Marriage with no malice or ill will for anyone.”
Which is it? You certainly expressed a goodly amount of malice and ill will about gay marriage in that other thread. You can’t expect to say rubbish like that and not have it influence peoples’ opinions of you. Enough with the righteous indignation. It’s phoney anyway.
@Frances: If you show TN exactly where she was wrong & in her own words, she’ll accuse you of, “clogging the blog.” And this…:
“You can’t expect to say rubbish like that and not have it influence peoples’ opinions of you.”
…is spot on.
When are Prejean’s bashers going to get it?
There is nothing wrong whatsoever about a Christian making a sex tape–per se. If there’s anything un-Christian about this sex tape, it’s that it was made with a boyfriend instead of a husband–in other words, premarital sex. Why are the voices in chorus against her not decrying the countless others who have not exactly clung to the rules of premarital chastity? Which is damn near everyone…
The matter of the relationship may be a question to be debated. Even among sincere Christians there is some call to rethink the strict rules of the past.
The sex video itself is incidental.
And who said this: “Marriage is the union between a man and a woman. And for me, as a Christian, it is also a sacred union.”
Another right-wing homophobe? Well you decide.
This are the words of then-candidate Barack Hussein Obama, campaigning in Lake Forest, CA.
Where is the chorus of accusation against him? I guess what is reprehensible for a pretty conservative is perfectly OK for a darling of the left.
And they say SHE is a hypocrite?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWtYdqbGNio
@ RHSimard. “Prejean bashers”? This woman sets herself up as a person of good Christian values and whines about losing the pageant because of her position on gay marriage. Nude pictures of her then emerge and now this sex video. She’s the one that put herself out there as a holier than thou role model. Obviously your infatuation with Prejean’s good looks (or maybe it’s her politics) has clouded your thinking.
@RHSimard: Whenever a Republican wants to debate an issue, they throw President Obama into the mix. President Obama is not the topic. Ms Prejean is, so let’s not change the subject. I am a “sincere Christian” & I find her to be a hypocrite & an opportunist, trying to sue the Pageant unjustly.
Anomaly, if whacking off makes you a hypocrite, then I confess to being a full fledged, red blooded, All American Hypocrite.
And your question “Anyone ever figure out what ‘opposite ses’ is?” You’re kidding? Right??
Frances, yes, I think they are for the most part morally deprived. But I wish them no ill. What is it about that you cannot comprehend?
My opposition to same sex marriage in no manner indicates I wish harm on anyone. And that is what just absolutely stupefies you people.
Tennessean says gays are morally deprived but thinks it doesn’t affect his position on gay marriage. Another example of ignorance for all to see.
@Tennessean: I was talking about Prejean. I was already certain that you, “whack off” frequently. No, I do NOT know what “Opposite sex” is. According to the genius of Prejean:
CARRIE: “I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one or the other. We live in a land that you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage.”
Can you defend THAT? Now I understand why you defend this numbskull. You are looking at her pictures, not her brain, or lack thereof. (see second sentence)
First of all RHSimard, Pres. Obama has his detractors from the left on this issue. Secondly, he’s not presented himself as a paid spokesman for the people who have put out fear-mongering propaganda against gay people. For her to say, “No offense,” and then go on a paid nationwide tour speaking out against gay marriage, says to me that she meant every offense. For her to claim she was dethroned because of her religious beliefs, when in fact it was the skank trail she left behind her that did her in, is just too funny.
If Carrie Prejean was a liberal or a Muslim, the Repubs would have been tearing her apart. You guys would have brought up her breast implants, which you are not allowed to have in these pageants. You would have had a field day with her masturbation video. If she were an atheist, you would have condemned her. You would have talked of her hypocrisy & fame seeking with media cameras & interviews. But, no, she’s a Repub, so defend the dumbass. Have at it guys. You now sound like you’re in her IQ range. Doh!
“Frances, yes, I think they are for the most part morally deprived. ”
So you choose to judge a person as immoral because of the way they were born. To me, that is the epitome of being morally deprived. Just as you judge, so you shall be judged. I hope I’m not around when your karma calls you on the phone.
@Tennessean: You think gay people are “morally deprived” but torturing people is moral & just? Are you serious! You are so hypocritical. YOU are morally deprived.
Tony, Deprived: marked by deprivation especially of the necessities of life or of healthful environmental influence.
Yes. I think one can say there is a degree of moral deprivation going on there. It has no effect on my opinion that the traditional marriage should be preserved.
Anomaly, the opposite sex (noun): (n [S + singular or plural verb])
Someone who is male if you are female, and female if you are male
(From the Cambridge Online Dictionary. I can’t get the link to copy and paste.)
@Tennessean, you left off the “whack job” part. Like calling someone a “morally deprived whack job” isn’t wishing them ill will. Maybe a sociopath wouldn’t think so. But it is something adversarial that someone would say about a group of people he didn’t like.
@Tennessean
Well, traditional marriage doesn’t work out for over 50% of the population, hence the high divorce rate. why not give same-sex couples a crack at it?
Carrie Prejean has just become the new face of Anita Bryant in a little more evolved society.
What we think of homosexuality is not just a moral opinion – This is someone’s Life we are messing with – Where did we get the power to decide what rights we will grant or deny to another American? Why would their pursuit of happiness be SECONDARY to our pursuit of happiness?
I’m just trying to make sense or grasp the logic of the arguments.
If the lifestyle is harming another person – criminalize it. If the lifestyle is offensive remove yourself from the area or don’t stare. BTW, how would you even KNOW if they were married or not? Do you know if the heterosexuals next door are married or gasp, living in sin?
[...] a followup to the Carrie Prejean story. . . Does Hannity get royalties for having written the forward to her [...]
@Tennessean: If you ventured outside of that narcissistic bubble you live in you might be able to follow a conversation. The dimwit, Ms Prejean said ” “We live in a land that you can choose same-sex marriage or OPPOSITE marriage.” I know what the “opposite sex” is. I’ve just never heard of, “opposite sex.”
According to Prejean & both of her brain cells, your definitions are in fact, “OPPOSITE”, therefore one of you is very wrong in your definition. So, Prejean, who is one of you new female Conservative leaders, is wrong, or you are. Scroll up & you’ll see that this is the 2nd copy & paste I’ve done on this enlightening subject. Try to keep up Larry…er..Tennessean.
In fact, oh wise one, copy & paste Dahl’s comment because it should be a dictionary. Look up Anita Bryant & you’ll see Prejean’s face next to it. However, Prejean apparently has not evolved. I can’t believe this idiot is trying to sell a book about her short 22 year life, in which she claims to be victimized. All she’s done that is noteworthy is the pageant, which is no biggie, relatively speaking. Even Elizabeth from the View, seemed to be having a difficult time defending Prejean’s Sainthood.
Jesus Friggin’ Christ Anomaly!
ALERT FROM INSIDE TENNESSEAN’S BUBBLE!!!!
12 and 20 messages above respectively: (direct quotes from “Anomaly100″)
“No, I do NOT know what “Opposite sex” is.”
“Anyone ever figure out what “opposite sex” is?”
@Tennessean: Don’t take what I’ve said out of context. It went like this:
“Anyone ever figure out what “opposite sex” is? That has got to be the funniest thing I’ve ever heard. I guess it’s whatever she was doing in the the video.”
You have NO sense of humor. Apparenly, you’ve forgotten that copying & pasting “clogs the blog.”
Slap yourself in the face & wake up.
Anomaly/Chester – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov-1S8Xxd94
Silly girl. I quoted your words exactly.
Btw….where did you come up with the “opposite marriage” quote? I’m not saying she didn’t say it. I just haven’t been able to find it as yet.
By the numbers:
@laurieD : She was TOLD, initially, the answer had cost her the crown. Later that changed. I am not saying there was any deception involved; in the absence of evidence to the contrary, I’ll assume both statements to her were correct as understood at the time.
It’s hardly surprising she’d be less than pleased at that, even if it took a day or two after learning of the updated information for it to wear off. That’s been a non-issue for a very long time.
Nude pictures? A few very mild topless and mostly not-quite topless. Maybe a lot of Christians don’t like that. Lots of others (including me) consider such very minimal exposure to be no big deal (Christian or non-Christian alike; this is not a position I’ve chosen only because of the Prejean debacle). In any case, raising bloody hell about it for just her is hypocritical.
I have yet to see any video, audio, online text or other quote of her pronouncing herself morally superior to anyone.
A wife making a video like that (or a thousand, for that matter) for a husband isn’t troubling Christian belief at all. She wasn’t married; that makes the tape just like any case of unmarried Christians having some kind of sexual involvement. See the stats on that? I’ll refrain from any moral opinion on it; suffice it to say that even among staunch evangelical Christian young adults, premarital chastity is in the minority, and the world seems to take that in stride–unless your name is Carrie Prejean. How God takes it is none of your business–or mine.
@Frances: The only reason to bring up Obama’s statement is to demonstrate the radical difference between the REACTION to his versus Carrie’s. If she is a “gay-hater” for her words, it follows that anyone else saying the same words must be the same thing, and you’d expect to see the same rancor about it. It’s not there.
And among you who are bashing her (I make no apologies for that choice of terminology), how many of you can honestly say that your dislike or disapproval of her began with the discovery of those photos or the tape? That you were fine with her, personally, before then?