.
Here is exactly why I think Sarah Palin is a worthless pile of crap.
“There’s been a lack of acknowledgment by our president in understanding what it is that the American military provides in terms of, obviously, the safety, the security of our country,” Palin said during an interview with Fox News’s Greta Van Susteren. “I want him to acknowledge the sacrifices that these individual men and women — our sons, our daughters, our moms, our dads, our brothers and sisters — are providing this country to keep us safe.”
“They’re making sacrifices,” said Palin, who visited the Army base at Fort Bragg on Monday as part of her ongoing book tour. “They’re putting so much on hold right now so that the homeland can be safe and they can fight for democratic ideals around our world. I want to see more acknowledgment and more respect given to them.”
This insufferable ignoramus thinks it proper to play politics using the men and women of the military as her little pawns as a means of gaining support from the dickheads too bloody brainless to know any different. I’ve really had it with this woman. I pray that Levi Johnston reveals every piece of dirt he’s got on what has to be the most ignorant, self-serving politician ever.
It’s one thing to continually lie through one’s teeth and it’s something else to play on people’s patriotism by making nonsensical and baseless claims. The only one showing disrespect for the sons, daughters, moms, dads, brothers and sisters serving in the military is this vile woman.
___
To receive email notifications of new posts from MarioPiperniDotCom, click on Subscribe.
.
 |
“There’s been a lack of acknowledgment by our president in understanding what it is …” Palin said…
Wuh-huh? That word salad needs some dressing.
And the rest of it is pure bullshit. To say that Pres. Obama doesn’t acknowledge the sacrifices our troops make is an outright lie. She’s either a liar or she’s stupid. Which is it? Or is it both, since it’s obvious to anyone with half a brain that Pres. Obama has the utmost respect and reverence for our service men and women. Palin needs to fact-check her ass so she can pull a clue out of it.
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by janinewallace: I’m really starting to hate Sarah Palin. http://twurl.nl/78×615 via @mariopiperni ||| awww your crush is waning?…
Her audience does not care for the truth. The truth would not set them free to threaten revolution. She is a classic demagogue playing on the ignorance and passions of her “followers.”
It bothers me that she has a son in the service, too. Makes her politicizing the military just that much more cynical.
President Obama has the greatest respect for our men and women as he is the President that was not afraid of going to Dover Air force base and receive the casket of the fallen and acknowledge their contribution to the country. The dramatic image of a president on the tarmac was a portrait not witnessed in years. Obama did so with the weight of knowing he may soon send more troops off to war
Bush never wanted to do it as the body bags reminded him of the lies that got our soldiers there in the first place.Bush spent lots of time with grieving military families but never went to Dover to meet the remains coming off the cargo plane.
As usual,Palin doesn’t know what she is talking about.
@Frances: “She’s either stupid or a liar?” I’m thinking she’s a stupid liar. The Prez has more respect for the troops then the last administration did. Shame on her stupid ass. (Anomaly)
Name me ONE politician that doesn’t trot out respect for Servicemen eveytime they want to score some easy points.
The balance of her statement in response to the question from Van Susteren: (paraphrased, “Do you want just words?)
“No, I want to see them equipped. I want to see them given everything that they need, including strategies, a surge strategy in Afghanistan, for one, so that they know that they’re there for victory, they’re not there just biding their time as lives are being lost.
I want our president and this administration to listen to the advisers who they hired, McChrystal, for one, back in March, telling the president, Here’s what we’re going to need there and then ramping up that advice lately, saying, Mr. President, here’s what we need in Afghanistan to win, to make sure that those terror cells don’t grow, so that those terrorists don’t come back over to the homeland in America, on our soil, and kill innocent Americans. I want him to listen to his advisers. That’s what he asked for.”
And she prefaced it with this statement which I know none of YOU would agree with but many people do:
“The worst thing — you know, I think that there’s been a lack of acknowledgment by our president in understanding what it is that the American military provides in terms of, obviously, the safety, the security of our country. There was the comment made the other night, you know, about, you know, the troops make for a good photo op, and, Hey, I’m giving you guys a raise, and that’s the applause line you need to…”
(I don’t know what comment she was referring to.)
I hope Tuesday night the President will announce that a surprise attack was made in the mountains bordering Afghanistan and Pakistan by member NATO nations and a lot of Taliban have surrendered or died. We need to clean up that area and maybe Bin Laden will be one of the prizes.
Bin Laden family is very close to the Bushes and this may be THE link to this delay in Afghanistan. Obama needs to deal with OSAMA. The reverse of OBAMA is AMABO which literally means ” I will love you ” The reverse of OSAMA is AMASO which literally means ” Pile ” It is hard for OBAMA to love this pile of crap OSAMA but the moment of truth needs to come between them so we can save more American lives.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/amabo_te
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/amaso
This needs to be done regardless of the sensitivities and sensibilities of Pakistan towards Taliban.
I support a war tax on the wealthy of this country to pay for a war we can never win, the object of which is to apprehend a person who isn’t even in the country where we are fighting.
Spoken like a true liberal. Never seen a tax they didn’t endorse.
“The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peoples’ money.” ~Margaret Thatcher
With every passing day, she gets stronger.
With every passing day, your messiah gets weaker. And why not? This is the Third Bush Term you voted for. Too bad you are waking up to that fact way too late.
Section 9,
The Obama term is to undo the two Bush terms. Don’t get confused about a Third Bush term. The recession is on hold and the economy is getting slowly stronger. Signs appear that employment will rise by second term next year and profits will be back in 2010.Our foreign policy is enhancing our position in the world and the world will respond in kind.
Your impatience is showing but your face will show greater disappointment when you experience the positive news by 2012.Obama is humbled by his abilities to go forward and he will fight for this country as you have never seen. So don’t talk to us about weakness for we gather strength from the ideals sown by our forefathers.This is why we are thankful this weekend.
Section 9,go to the back section where you belong.
“Section 9,go to the back section where you belong.”
Liberal Tolerance and Inclusiveness manifests itself
I think I’ve figured it out. Palin makes Liberals ashamed of themselves. Therefore, the virulent hatred.
Tennessean,
With what you dish out on this blog,I have no lessons to take from you.
Section 9 insults us and is misinformed on top of that so we better respond because we defend the right of speech but to a limit.”With every passing day, your messiah gets weaker” is a premise that is incorrect. We defend the man but we don’t worship him. If Obama seriously fails in something he needs to pay the price. Do you think I will tolerate anyone suggesting that I am a sheep and will go blindly in situations without investigation ?
Inclusiveness has a broader meaning today which has a focus on ethnicity and race but since I don’t know the person I don’t think you mean it that way. But on the basic meaning,if Section 9 wanted to be part of a positive discussion without fiction or derogatory comments,we would welcome his/her assumptions and debate logically.
If you think what I said is virulent hatred for an individual,you better get in front of the bus mister because you win hands down on the history of this blog. You do it so often you lost sight of the meaning of the word. To write the word as often as you do,you must be full of it yourself.
Again,no lesson to be learned from you.
Jovial says, “We defend the man but we don’t worship him.” And I would categorically disagree with that.
You apparently misunderstood my comment. I made no mention of “lessons” for you or anyone else. At least I don’t think I did and don’t see it on this post.
And I was speaking to the hatred you people seem to focus on Palin. And please don’t try to tell me you don’t.
While your at it, how did this person “insult” you? They simply stated their beliefs. You disagree. Where’s the insult?
And back to the “worship” thing, aren’t you the one that used to always end your comments with “Go Obama Go” or “Change you can believe in” or some trite sentiment similar to that?
I said Yes you can which applies to every individual that wants change
Too bad you can’t recognize when someone offends you. Sorry sight
Jovial, I’m not sure what you’re talking about. I’m not sure I care. I believe you misunderstood my comment. I wasn’t trying to give you any “lessons”. And I did not say your comments represented hatred, virulent or otherwise.
I’m just curious why Liberals hate Sarah Palin so much. I have quite genuinely given it considerable thought. I can’t discern a logical reason for it, other that possibly she makes liberals “ashamed” for some of their beliefs. For who they are.
Until someone can give me a more credible reason, I’m not sure I see a reason to think otherwise.
“Too bad you can’t recognize when someone offends you.” I assume you are talking about section 9 and your “perceived” insult. Again, are you insulted that someone simply thinks differently than you?
And what would YOU call signing off your comments with a candidate’s campaign motto? I would call it something closely resembling a form of “hero worship”.
Some people should stop assuming. It always turns out badly. Always.
Sometimes I think you have too much time on your hands and that although people try to explain things to you,you don’t care and you simply rant and repeat the same thing.
I have been insulted but you can’t understand because you are an agnostic.
You have a lot of motivational speakers that use human text to excite one’s curiosity and these are slogans and not hero worship.
I dislike Sarah Palin because for me hatred involves wanting ill of her and I don’t. I just dislike what she represents and just as false prophets have to be exposed so does hypocrites like Palin need to be exposed. She represents the worse of what America shares as values.
So there it is in a nutshell. Even a wingnut can understand this
Jovial – What are the values that you hold? How do they differ from her values?
Jovial, while you and Frances are spending so much effort commenting on things about me of which you have no knowledge, please allow me to point out I said nothing about your intelligence, insulting you, your hatred or anything else particularly about you.
Again, I simply do not understand the left’s virulent disdain and hatred of anything “Palin”. In my effort to try to understand those reactions, I can’t come up with any logical reason. So, I apply standards I apply to myself, conclusions I have reached in my own “pathetic” little deliberations, and I feel, as I stated, she makes Liberals just a little ashamed of themselves. I think she makes liberals and particularly liberals of the feminine persuasion question some of the liberal positions they hold.
Now, I’m not stating that as a fact, I’m just stating it as something I believe to some degree and have observed nothing to cause me to seriously question my beliefs.
As far as your “insult”, you would be correct on that one. I guess maybe you are saying the “messiah” comment insulted you because of your religion? (That’s the only thing I can see so if I’m wrong, I AM stupid and if you care to, I’d welcome your explanation.)
But if that is correct, don’t you think you’re wearing your religion on your sleeve a bit? And isn’t that one of the left’s biggest criticisms of the right? Religious considerations in their politics? It has nothing to do with my agnostic leanings. I just would not have considered what he said in that particular situation an affront to my religion. “Messiah” does have broader definition than a reference to Jesus.
You are correct. I do have too much time on my hands….sometimes.
TN, you seem to spend a lot of time putting words in other people’s mouths – mostly based on stupid assumptions.