Why is this guy still in business?
Sheriff Joe Arpaio's volunteer investigation into documents pertaining to President Barack Obama's place of birth and citizenship now includes the services of a taxpayer-funded ...
The lies roll off the man's lips like music off Yo-Yo Ma's cello. Both are virtuosos - one a cellist, the other a liar.
A partial list.
Bush had nothing to do ...
Happy Friday.
The best from Political Humor‘s collection of the week’s late night political humor.
"Barack Obama supports same-sex marriage. Mitt Romney doesn't even support same-sex car pools." –David Letterman
"The head of ...
Republican Rep. Mike Coffman at a Saturday afternoon fundraiser in Colorado.
I don't know whether Barack Obama was born in the United States of America. I don't know that. But I ...
Rand Paul:
Call me cynical, but I didn’t think his [Obama's] views on marriage could get any gayer.
We won't call Rand cynical. Ignorant, bigoted asshole is more fitting. An adult using ...
Happy Friday.
The best from Political Humor‘s collection of the week’s late night political humor.
"President Obama came out with approval of same-sex marriage. He said that over the years, he has ...
I've never understood Log Cabin Republicans - gay conservatives who give their support to a homophobic political party that derides their sexuality and refuses to grant them equal rights under ...
Finally.
“I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors when I think about members of my own ...
Election roundup:
Indiana.
As polls forecast, the Tea Party's efforts to cleanse the GOP of any impure conservatives has Dick Lugar out and teabagger Richard Mourdock in. Mourdock is the new Republican ...
There are lies...and then there are lies.
My own view, by the way, was that the auto companies needed to go through bankruptcy before government help. And frankly, that’s finally what ...
From the papers captured last year at Osama bin Laden's Pakistani hideout comes this.
Like any public figures, bin Laden and his advisers were mindful of the media. Adam Gadahn, one ...
The best from Political Humor‘s collection of the week’s late night political humor. Happy Friday.
"Today Mitt Romney visited a firehouse here in New York City. Of course, he was disappointed ...
It happened to Kerry. Can it happen to Obama? Nope says Margaret Carlson.
Obama’s belief system -- in that hopey-changey business and the post-partisanship thing -- has been altered by reality. ...
Sullivan:
What do Republicans call a gay man with neoconservative passion, a committed relationship and personal courage?
A faggot.
Exactly right, but then could one expect anything different from a political party that ...
And they claim that atheists are immoral?
The ugly side of religion shows its face once again. The words below were spoken at a Sunday sermon by Sean Harris, a pastor ...
It's been fun watching conservatives and Romney twist themselves into pretzels trying to undo Mitt's past words on GM and bin Laden.
Romney, April 2007:
It’s not worth moving heaven and earth ...
In an op-ed piece in the Washington Post, a couple of scholars from liberal and conservative think tanks, discuss the state of American politics.
We have been studying Washington politics and ...
Romney's VP-in-waiting, Marco Rubio, is perfecting the conservative sleaze play.
He has proposed his version of the Dream Act in which people who entered the country illegally as children will be ...
Beyond the rhetoric, the political BS, the lies - that is, the concerted effort by the right-wing noise machine to distort and misinform at every opportunity - is the very ...
It’s not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person. [...] the country would be safer by only ‘a small percentage’ and would see ‘a very insignificant increase in safety’ if al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden was caught because another terrorist would rise to power.
Of course I would have ordered the taking out of Osama bin Laden. Of course. This is a person who had done terrible harm to America and who represented a continuing threat to civilized people throughout the world. If I had been president of the United States, I would have made the same decision the president made, which was to remove him.
IF General Motors, Ford and Chrysler get the bailout that their chief executives asked for yesterday, you can kiss the American automotive industry goodbye. It won’t go overnight, but its demise will be virtually ]guaranteed.
Romney chief strategist, Eric Fehrnstrom, April 2012:
His [Romney's] position on the bailout was exactly what President Obama followed. He said, ‘If you want to save the auto industry, just don’t write them a check. That will seal their doom. What they need to do is go through a managed bankruptcy process.’
Consider that the crown jewel. The only economic success that President Obama has had is because he followed Mitt Romney’s advice.
Mitt Romney – a living, breathing cartoon if ever there was one.
Mitt Romney believes that his best line of attack is making the claim that he has not spent a moment as a D.C. politician while his two main opponents, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum, are the combined epitome of the Washington insider. Yesterday, he added to this by pointing out that Speaker Gingrich and Senator Santorum both had a spend, spend, spend approach to governing thereby making the two lawmakers “the very Republicans who acted like Democrats.”
This prompted a HuffPo reader to ask a straightforward question.
You mean… Newt and Rick believe in helping the middle class and poor, protecting the environment, creating jobs, building our nation’s infrastructure, improving education for our kids and basing science and history on actual truth?
To which I add; are truth and logic not beautiful things?
Of course they are.
(The source image for this illustration is a Creative Commons licensed image from photographer Gage Skidmore.)
__
Frank Luntz, master of political communication professional liar, told a meeting of Republican Governors how deeply concerned he was about the impact Occupy Wall Street is having on political discourse and American’s view of capitalism. Imagine having people realize that capitalists don’t always have their best interests at heart. That would do serious damage to that ‘job creators’ image conservatives have so carefully crafted over the last while.
Luntz outlined his strategy on how conservatives should best deal with lie to and about the movement. Chris Moody has the full list.
Don’t say ‘capitalism.’: “I’m trying to get that word removed and we’re replacing it with either ‘economic freedom’ or ‘free market,’ ” Luntz said. “The public . . . still prefers capitalism to socialism, but they think capitalism is immoral. And if we’re seen as defenders of quote, Wall Street, end quote, we’ve got a problem.”
Don’t say ‘taxes the rich’: “If you talk about raising taxes on the rich,” the public responds favorably, Luntz cautioned. But ”if you talk about government taking the money from hardworking Americans, the public says no. Taxing, the public will say yes.”
Don’t say ‘middle class’: “They cannot win if the fight is on hardworking taxpayers. We can say we defend the ‘middle class’ and the public will say, I’m not sure about that. But defending ‘hardworking taxpayers’ and Republicans have the advantage.”
Don’t say ‘entrepreneur’: “Use the phrases “small business owners” and “job creators” instead of “entrepreneurs” and “innovators.”
Blame Washington for everything: Tell them, “You shouldn’t be occupying Wall Street, you should be occupying Washington. You should occupy the White House because it’s the policies over the past few years that have created this problem.”
Noam Chomsky, co-author of the 1988 book – Manufacturing Consent, understands only too well propaganda of this sort.
The question is whether privileged elite should dominate mass communication and should use this power as they tell us they must — namely to impose necessary illusions, to manipulate and deceive the stupid majority and remove them from the public arena. The question in brief, is whether democracy and freedom are values to be preserved or threats to be avoided. In this possibly terminal phase of human existence, democracy and freedom are more than values to be treasured; they may well be essential to survival.
It all comes down to corporate interests (by way of media and politicians) manufacturing knowledge as a means to shape public opinion. With the help of shameless politicos like Luntz, Republicans have mastered the art form.
On the bright side, the fact that Republicans feel they need a plan as manipulative and deceiving as the one outlined by Luntz tells you that OWS is making a difference. The big boys are worried…and that’s a good thing.
The Crusades – “valiant struggle” for a noble cause or a barbaric act of aggression against Muslims and Jews? Rick Santorum knows where he stands on the issue.
“The idea that the Crusades and the fight of Christendom against Islam is somehow an aggression on our part is absolutely anti-historical,” Santorum said in Spartanburg on Tuesday. “And that is what the perception is by the American left who hates Christendom.”
“They hate Western civilization at the core. That’s the problem.”
No, the problem has to do with people like Santorum who have hijacked an entire religion and turned it into a political tool. Idiotic comments (“left hates Christendom” as if Christian liberals are non-existant) might sound good to an audience of dolts who learn about the world from the likes of Fox News but the words are little more than rhetorical dung eaten up with great joy by a base too clueless to know they’re being served shit.
As for Santorum’s thoughts on the Crusades, the only thing that is “anti-historical” is his comment. The Crusades were an act of aggression lasting a few hundred years which targeted and killed thousands of non-Christians. Along the way, large numbers of Christians who were deemed to have served under Muslim rule were also slaughtered. The purpose of the Crusades had little to do with promoting or defending Christianity and everything to do with enriching both the Church and the ruling European nobility who sanctioned the killing and pillaging and plundering of thousands of innocent people. The Crusades were one of the most despicable acts in history.
Having Santorum defend the Crusades is not unlike hearing people today defend the Iraq war as a noble mission of freeing an oppressed people. Yeah, right. Tell that story to the hundreds of thousands of innocent dead Iraqis who paid the ultimate price so Dick Cheney could have one of his orgasmic wet dreams fulfilled.
Lowlifes like Santorum love to chant that all men are created equal. What they leave out of their message is that “men” implies white, Christian and American. How dare them god-hating liberals cast the slaughter of brown people in a bad light. Aggression, you say? What aggression?
What’s next on the list for Santorum? Will he soon be defending the Inquisition and decrying how the left’s anti-historical, anti-Christendom and anti-Western civilization ideology has given death by burning a bad rap?
How long before Republicans start asking for funds to have Ronald Reagan’s face carved out of granite alongside Lincoln’s on Mount Rushmore? Conservative politicians appear unable to give a speech these days without mentioning the holy trinity of divine truth and wisdom: Reagan, God and the Founding Fathers.
…much of what today’s voters think they know about the 40th president is more myth than reality, misconceptions resulting from the passage of time or from calculated attempts to rebuild or remake Reagan’s legacy.
So what might some of those myths be?
1. Reagan was one of our most popular presidents.
His average approval rating during his eight years? 52.8 percent – lower than Lyndon Johnson, H. W. Bush and Clinton.
2. Reagan was a tax-cutter.
He raised taxes in 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986 and 1987. Who got screwed? You guessed it – the middle class who “paid a higher percentage of their income in taxes when Reagan left office than when he came in.”
3. Reagan was a hawk.
He bombed Libya in 1986. Before that? Nothing. After that? Nothing.
4. Reagan shrank the federal government.
Under Reagan…
a) Spending grew by an average of 2.5 percent a year.
b) National debt when Reagan took office: $700 billion. National debt when Reagan left office: $3 trillion.
c) Number of federal employees when Reagan took office: 2.8 million. Number of federal employees when Reagan left office: 3 million.
Ronald Reagan has to be the most over-rated president in American history. The man was a conservative with charisma, charm and a Hollywood background who would be unable to get the backing of today’s Tea Party. Reagan was weak on immigration, he tripled the national debt, raised taxes and grew government – not quite your teabagger’s cup of tea.
As for what the Reagan years represented, Bill Clinton had it figured out in 1991.
“The Reagan-Bush years have exalted private gain over public obligation, special interests over the common good, wealth and fame over work and family. The 1980s ushered in a Gilded Age of greed and selfishness, of irresponsibility and excess, and of neglect.”
In the words of the Great One, tear down those myths!
Recent Comments