.

With the Senate 60-40 vote last night to move the health care bill forward, it appears that the final vote is slated for Christmas Eve.  The Senate bill in its current version is a compromise position which was stripped of the public option, Medicare buy-in as well as abortion insurance coverage. It’s a bill which was hijacked by the likes of a Joe Lieberman and Ben Nelson…a bill which Republicans are still attempting to block with ever procedural trick in the book.

Paul Krugman looks at what is quickly becoming an ungovernable situation.

Unless some legislator pulls off a last-minute double-cross, health care reform will pass the Senate this week. Count me among those who consider this an awesome achievement. It’s a seriously flawed bill, we’ll spend years if not decades fixing it, but it’s nonetheless a huge step forward.

It was, however, a close-run thing. And the fact that it was such a close thing shows that the Senate — and, therefore, the U.S. government as a whole — has become ominously dysfunctional.

After all, Democrats won big last year, running on a platform that put health reform front and center. In any other advanced democracy this would have given them the mandate and the ability to make major changes. But the need for 60 votes to cut off Senate debate and end a filibuster — a requirement that appears nowhere in the Constitution, but is simply a self-imposed rule — turned what should have been a straightforward piece of legislating into a nail-biter. And it gave a handful of wavering senators extraordinary power to shape the bill.

Now consider what lies ahead. We need fundamental financial reform. We need to deal with climate change. We need to deal with our long-run budget deficit. What are the chances that we can do all that — or, I’m tempted to say, any of it — if doing anything requires 60 votes in a deeply polarized Senate?

[...]

But the modern system, in which the minority party uses the threat of a filibuster to block every bill it doesn’t like, is a recent creation.

The political scientist Barbara Sinclair has done the math. In the 1960s, she finds, “extended-debate-related problems” — threatened or actual filibusters — affected only 8 percent of major legislation. By the 1980s, that had risen to 27 percent. But after Democrats retook control of Congress in 2006 and Republicans found themselves in the minority, it soared to 70 percent.

The key to this whole thing is that with the 60 vote requirement in the Senate, every bill passed will be seriously flawed. When a single member of Congress can wield the power that a Lieberman did, then what more can one expect. The greater good of the nation is forfeited in favor of the self-serving wants of a single politician. Not good.

Krugman sums it up.

Nobody should meddle lightly with long-established parliamentary procedure. But our current situation is unprecedented: America is caught between severe problems that must be addressed and a minority party determined to block action on every front. Doing nothing is not an option — not unless you want the nation to sit motionless, with an effectively paralyzed government, waiting for financial, environmental and fiscal crises to strike.

___

To receive email notifications of new posts from MarioPiperniDotCom, click on Subscribe.

.